SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2025
Comorbidities in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis trial population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular disease in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Aging alters synergistic microRNA networks in exosomes to stimulate repair in lung injury and skin wound healing.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Atherogenic Indices in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence of Subclinical Atherosclerosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Retrospective Observational Study of Nintedanib in Managing Idiopathic and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Routine Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComorbidities can affect drug tolerability and health outcomes in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the types and prevalence of comorbidities amongst participants in pharmaceutical randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF).
methodsOvid Medline, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched to identify phase II and III pharmaceutical RCTs of IPF or PPF. Reporting of comorbidities was evaluated, with meta-analyses being performed for the prevalence of different conditions.
results34 articles were included, with 23 unique trials for IPF and one for PPF. A mean of 14 (range 1-44) comorbidities per study was reported in the IPF RCTs, with 11 being reported in the PPF RCT. Common comorbidities in the IPF RCT cohorts were systemic hypertension (pooled prevalence 45%, 95% CI 39-50%), hyperlipidaemia (38%, 95% CI 27-49%), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (45%, 95% CI 36-54%), ischaemic heart disease (18%, 95% CI 13-42%) and diabetes mellitus (16%, 95% CI 13-20%). The PPF trial cohort had similar types and prevalence of comorbidities to those reported in the IPF trial cohorts.
conclusionsReporting of comorbidities varied across previous IPF RCTs, with limited data available for PPF. Prevalence of comorbidities reported in the IPF and PPF trial cohorts appear to be lower than those reported in prospective patient registries. There is a need for careful consideration of trial eligibility criteria with detailed reporting of comorbidities in future pharmaceutical RCTs to better understand the applicability of trial findings to real-world patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.