ArticleBMJ open2025
Health and education outcomes from adolescence to adulthood for young people with neurodisability and their peers: protocol for a population-based cohort study using linked hospital and education data from England.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Educational attainment among primary school children with neurodisability: a population-based cohort study using linked education and health data from England.Archives of disease in childhood · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChildren and young people with neurodisability (conditions affecting the brain or nervous system, creating functional impairment, eg, autism, learning disabilities, epilepsy, cerebral palsy or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder) have more complex health and educational needs than their peers, contributing to higher healthcare use and special educational needs (SEN) provision. To guide policy and improve services, evidence is needed on how health and education support and outcomes change with age for adolescents with and without neurodisability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using the Education and Child Health Insights from Linked Data (ECHILD) database, which links health and education data across England, we will follow adolescents from the start of secondary school (Year 7) into early adulthood. We will classify children with and without neurodisability recorded in hospital and education records before Year 7, compare their sociodemographic characteristics and describe trends in health and educational outcomes throughout secondary school. We will estimate rates of planned and unplanned healthcare contacts by year of age (11-22 years old), and we will examine changes in trends before, during and after transition to adult healthcare. We will also estimate the proportion of adolescents with school-recorded SEN provision and rates of school absences and exclusions by year of age (11-15 years old) for the two groups. We will explore variation in outcomes by neurodisability subgroup and sociodemographic characteristics and contextualise the findings using existing interview and survey data from children, young people and parents/carers generated in the Health Outcomes of young People throughout Education (HOPE) research programme. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for analyses of the ECHILD database has been granted previously (20/EE/0180). Findings will be shared with academics, policymakers and stakeholders, and published in open-access journals. Code and metadata will be shared in the ECHILD GitHub repository.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.