Evidence mapPaperPMID 40107699Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Embodied conversational agents for shared decision-making: a scoping review protocol.

Hongzhan Jiang, Xuejing Li, Meiqi Meng, Dan Yang, Ziyan Wang, Yufang Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongzhan JiangSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0091-370X
Xuejing LiSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meiqi MengSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Dan YangSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ziyan WangSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yufang HaoSchool of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China bucmnursing@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmbodied conversational agents (ECAs) are computer-based dialogue systems designed to simulate face-to-face interactions by incorporating human-like physical attributes. Their capacity to establish and maintain an empathic relationship in patient interactions positions them as innovative tools that facilitate shared decision-making (SDM). To systematically synthesise the existing evidence concerning the development and application of ECAs in promoting SDM, this protocol delineates a scoping review designed to identify and present the available evidence within this domain. Specifically, the protocol outlines a review that will concentrate on the key features of ECAs in the context of SDM, including their appearance, dialogue mechanisms and emotional models, within the framework, as well as their implementation and evaluation in clinical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The framework established by Arksey and O'Malley will be employed to guide the scoping review process. This protocol outlines the systematic retrieval of seven databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore Digital Library and Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library. The search strategy has been developed and will be conducted across each database, from its inception to September 2024. Two researchers will conduct literature screening and data extraction independently. The results will be systematically organised and presented through narrative abstracts, tables and/or figures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not necessary for this review, as it uses data that have been previously collected. Furthermore, the obtained results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Open Science Framework Registries (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BN3CM).

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision Making, SharedHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicDecision-MakingeHealthHealth

Identifiers

PMID40107699
PMCPMC11927471

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.