ArticleScientific reports2025
Early prediction of microvascular obstruction prior to percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of endothelial glycocalyx degradation with post-PCI slow flow phenomenon in STEMI patients: a prospective observational study.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Reperfusion injury in STEMI: a double-edged sword.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early prediction of microvascular obstruction (MVO) occurrence in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can facilitate personalized management and improve prognosis. This study developed a prediction model for MVO occurrence using preoperative clinical data and validated its performance in a prospective cohort. A total of 504 AMI patients were included, with 406 in the exploratory cohort and 98 in the prospective cohort. Feature selection was performed using random forest recursive feature elimination (RF-RFE), identifying five key predictors: High-Sensitivity Troponin T, Neutrophil Count, Creatine Kinase-MB, Fibrinogen, and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. Among the models developed, logistic regression demonstrated the highest predictive performance, achieving an AUC score of 0.800 in the exploratory cohort and 0.792 in the prospective cohort. This model has been integrated into a user-friendly online platform, providing a practical tool for guiding personalized perioperative management and improving patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.