Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108500›Full record

Trial reportBMC nephrology2025

Association of patent ductus arteriosus treatment in extremely low gestational age neonates with two year kidney outcomes: a secondary analysis of the preterm erythropoietin neuroprotection trial (PENUT).

Paige E Condit, Ronnie Guillet, Dinushan Kaluarachchi, Russell L Griffin, Shina Menon, David J Askenazi, Matthew W Harer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Stealing nephrons-a review on how patent ductus arteriosus physiology impacts neonatal kidney health.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paige E ConditDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. pcondit@wisc.edu.
Ronnie GuilletDivision of Neonatology, Golisano Children's Hospital, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Dinushan KaluarachchiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Russell L GriffinDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Shina MenonDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
David J AskenaziDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Matthew W HarerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is variable and includes expectant, medical, and procedural options. Both the hemodynamic effects of a PDA and its treatment put neonates at risk for acute kidney injury (AKI). Little is known about how different management approaches to a PDA, either conservative management or active management and either medical or surgical treatment, in preterm neonates impact kidney function over the longer term. The objective of this study is to evaluate rates of kidney dysfunction at two years of age in extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) with treated compared to untreated PDAs.

methodsSecondary analysis of prospectively collected data from the PENUT trial. Kidney dysfunction defined by: eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m

resultsOf 780 ELGANs, 261 (43%) were treated for PDA. Of those treated, 168 (64.4%) received pharmacologic treatment, 12 (4.6%) received surgical treatment, 57 (21.8%) received both, and 24 (9.2%) were listed as having a treated PDA without specification of management. After adjusting for confounding factors, those actively treated for a PDA were less likely to have SBP > 90th percentile at two years (29.5% treated vs. 34.3% control, adjusted OR 0.59, CI 0.36-0.99). The adjusted odds-ratios for differences in other 2-year kidney outcomes did not differ. Among those medically treated, indomethacin was used more commonly than either ibuprofen or acetaminophen.

conclusionsELGANs receiving treatment for a PDA were less likely to have elevated SBP at two years. Prospective studies are needed to examine the effects of a hemodynamically significant PDA and its management on long-term kidney outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryDuctus Arteriosus, PatentErythropoietinChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIbuprofenIndomethacinInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornMaleProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeErythropoietinIbuprofenIndomethacinAcetaminophenChronic kidney diseaseHypertensionIbuprofenIndomethacinKidney dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40108500
PMCPMC11924701

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.