ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025
Energetic Value of Women's Work: Assessing Maternal Energetic Costs From Acorn Foraging.
Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPerceptions of female energetic contributions and their role in human evolution are limited. This exploratory study compares energy expenditure, return rate, and foraging efficiency between infant carrying methods in females simulating acorn foraging practices by Indigenous communities in western North America. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter resting metabolic rate (RMR) was collected, female volunteers (n = 6, age: 21-37) conducted three 1-h bouts of acorn foraging. First, volunteers foraged unloaded (control) while for the second and third bouts they foraged carrying a traditional basketry cradle or a chest sling (randomized order) with 4.5 kg sandbags. Energy expenditure (EE) was measured through indirect calorimetry, physical activity intensity was assessed using accelerometry, and foraging return rates (RR) were calculated after acorn processing.
resultsThe inter-bout results are not statistically significant. Findings show, however, that foraging RR largely surpasses EE irrespective of infant carrying method. The cradle carrying technique resulted in the largest mean EE, yet it was more efficient than the sling-carrying method. Most of the time foraging was spent at moderate physical intensity, especially during cradle-carrying bouts compared to the sling-carrying and control groups.
conclusionsThis small exploratory study demonstrates the caloric contributions by and foraging efficiency of females. Our findings emphasize that child-carrying techniques using basketry cradles allow for improved efficiency in foraging returns compared to more commonly used slings. Our results reinforce previous findings of female foraging efficiency despite the energetic demands of infant carrying and emphasize the energetic contributions of females to human evolution even during child-rearing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.