SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2025
The Impact of
Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Akkermansia muciniphila : A next-generation gut probiotic supporting neurorepair and functional recovery.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Short-chain fatty acid-producing psychobiotics in mood disorders: mechanistic insights into the microbiota-gut-brain axis.Clinical nutrition research · 2026Article
- From gut to brain: effects of fecal microbiota transplants from humans to rats on hippocampal gene regulation - a study on anorexia nervosa.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Sex differences in behaviors, neuronal activation, and gut-microbiota-metabolic axis in a repeated nitroglycerin-induced chronic migraine model.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- ProbioticBrain sciences · 2026Article
- Akkermansia muciniphila improving depression-like behaviors by regulating glycerophospholipid metabolism in gut-brain axis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAkkermansia muciniphila (A. muciniphila), a bacterial species within the human gut microbiome, has shown beneficial effects on host health. Emerging research suggests that A. muciniphila also influences neurobehavioral domains through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This meta-analysis evaluates A. muciniphila's impact on depression, anxiety, and stress in mouse models.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to March 2024, identifying 15 eligible studies.
resultsSupplementation with A. muciniphila, its outer membrane protein (Amuc_1100), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) alleviated anxiety, depressive-like behaviors, and enhanced memory in mice. Compared to controls, intervention groups exhibited reduced anxiety-like behaviors, including increased travel distance in the open-field test (OFT) and more time spent in the lightbox during the light-dark box (LDB) test and open arms in the elevated plus maze (EPM). Depression-like symptoms were reduced, with lower immobility time in the tail suspension and forced swim tests. Memory function also improved, and learning time was reduced in the Y-maze and Barnes circular maze tests. Serotonin levels increased significantly in the serum and hippocampus, while corticosterone levels decreased, though not significantly. The intervention reduced hippocampal and serum inflammatory markers (TNFα, IL1β, IL6) and altered gut microbiome composition, increasing Akkermansia, Roseburia, Caldicoprobacter, and Lachnospiraceae.
conclusionThis meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the health-promoting effects of A. muciniphila, one of the next-generation probiotics, in alleviating neuropsychiatric disorders. Given the high prevalence and clinical significance of depression, anxiety, and stress, further investigation into the therapeutic utility of A. muciniphila is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.