ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025
Assessing factors associated with nurses leaving the profession: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working Well in a Dynamic Nursing Career: A Critical Incident Technique Study of Nurses' Actions for a Sustainable Working Life.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Perceived stress and mobile phone addiction among Chinese undergraduate nursing students: the mediating role of organizational caring climate and self-control.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Predictors of Health-Workforce Job Satisfaction in Primary Care Settings: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Multi-Country Study in Eight African Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Perspectives and Meaning of Role Transition Lived by Experienced Nurses: A Phenomenological Study.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nurse turnover is a global challenge affecting workforce stability, financial sustainability of healthcare systems, and the quality of care. Despite extensive research, a limited number of researchers have explored the actual reasons behind nurses leaving the profession as opposed to leaving their job, particularly in relation to demographic variables. Objective: We aimed to explore how demographic factors-age, sex, and work area-influenced nurses' experiences of key turnover factors, providing insights to inform tailored retention strategies. Design: Secondary cross-sectional analysis of national survey data. Settings: Data were collected by Statistics Sweden through a mail survey. Participants: The sample consisted of 2,860 individuals with nursing qualifications who had left the profession between 2005 and 2013 and responded to a 2016 survey. Methods: The analysis involved exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling to identify and examine five latent factors contributing to nurses leaving the profession. The researchers assessed the impact of demographic variables on these factors. Results: Five primary factors were identified: compensation and fairness, psychosocial work environment, career development constraints, non-clinical workload, and support and safety. Younger nurses and those outside primary care reported greater dissatisfaction across multiple factors, while female nurses faced heightened psychosocial strain. Work area differences also influenced perceptions of support and workload. Conclusions: We have underscored the significant role of demographic variables associated with leaving the nursing profession. Tailored interventions, such as structured mentorship for younger nurses, family-supportive policies for female nurses, and workload optimization in high-stress areas, may be helpful. The results are limited by the age of the data, which predates recent healthcare shifts, emphasizing the importance of regular workforce monitoring. Registration: Not registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.