ArticleEJHaem2025
Bortezomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone Regimen (BDR) in Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia: A Retrospective Real-World Analysis.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Waldenström macroglobulinemia-associated renal AL amyloidosis: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We retrospectively analysed bortezomib-dexamethasone-rituximab (BDR) combination in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) in a real world setting. Methods: A total of 87 patients were included: 49 patients (56%) were treated in frontline, 22 (25%) in second line and 16 (19%) in third or further line settings. A log-rank test was used to compare overall and event-free survival (OS and EFS) whereas a Gray's test was performed to compare cumulative incidence of deaths and relapse (CID and CIR) according to the IPSS-WM groups, MYD88/CXCR4 mutational status and line of therapy. Results: The overall response rate was 88% with five patients (6%) achieving complete response, 20 (24%) very good partial response, 38 (45%) partial response and 11 (13%) minor response. The median time to achieve the best overall response was 9 months and the median EFS was 33 months for whole cohort. Patients treated in third line or further relapse settings had significantly lower median EFS compared to those treated in second- or first-line setting (13 vs. 36 vs. 47 months, respectively, Conclusion: BDR represents an interesting chemo-free, fixed duration regimen for patients in first or second line, regardless of mutational status. Trial Registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.