SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the depth of myometrial infiltration in early endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A nomogram for predicting high-risk endometrial cancer based on the transvaginal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Globally, endometrial cancer (EC) is currently one of the most common gynecologic malignancies among females. Preoperative infiltration depth analysis is important for disease progression and prognostic impact. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the infiltration depth analysis of EC. Method: Electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched for more extensive literature on CEUS in the diagnosis of myometrial infiltration in EC patients up to March 29, 2024. Cochran Q and I² were used to assess the heterogeneity of eligible studies. Sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were analyzed for each clinical outcome using a bivariate random effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also generated. Results: In total, 23 papers with 1247 EC patients were included in the meta-analysis. The SEN, SPE, PLR, NLR, and DOR for the diagnosis of deep myometrial infiltration (DMI) of EC using CEUS were 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 0.89], 0.92 (95%CI: 0.90, 0.94), 11.05 (95%CI: 8.00, 15.25), 0.17 (95%CI: 0.12, 0.23), and 64.91 (95%CI: 37.11, 113.52), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.93, 0.97). For the diagnosis of superficial myometrial invasion (SMI) of EC by CEUS, the SEN, SPEN, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.91 (95%CI: 0.85, 0.95), 0.80 (95%CI: 0.64, 0.90), 4.55 (95%CI: 2.34, 8.85), 0.11 (95%CI: 0.06, 0.21), 41.40 (95%CI: 12.14, 141.13), and 0.94 (95%CI: 0.91, 0.95), respectively. Conclusion: CEUS might be a reliable and practical technique for EC myometrial infiltration diagnosis. More clinical data and studies are still needed to confirm these results in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.