ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Heart failure and microvascular dysfunction: an in-depth review of mechanisms, diagnostic strategies, and innovative therapies.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Continuous-Flow Mechanical Circulatory Support to Heart Transplantation: Hemodynamic, Immunometabolic, and Body Composition Determinants of Rehabilitation Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Brain‑heart axis: Neurostimulation techniques in ischemic heart disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on ion channels in heart failure: focus on the endothelium.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Review
- Research Progress in Imaging Evaluation of Myocardial Microcirculation.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Heart failure: mechanistic insights and precision therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microvascular dysfunction (MVD) is increasingly recognized as a critical contributor to the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF), particularly in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) significantly impacts HFpEF by reducing coronary flow reserve and myocardial perfusion reserve, leading to adverse outcomes such as myocardial ischemia, diastolic dysfunction, and increased risk of major cardiovascular events, including atrial fibrillation. In HFrEF, microvascular impairment is linked to heightened oxidative stress, reduced nitric oxide production, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, further driving disease progression and contributing to poor prognosis. Advancements in diagnostic techniques, such as positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and biomarker analysis, improve our ability to assess CMD in heart failure patients, enabling earlier diagnosis and risk stratification. Emerging therapies, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and endothelial-targeted interventions, enhance microvascular function and improve patient outcomes. The role of personalized medicine is becoming increasingly important, as individualized therapeutic approaches tailored to patient-specific microvascular abnormalities are essential for optimizing treatment effectiveness. This review underscores the pivotal role of MVD in HF. It highlights the urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies and diagnostic tools to address this complex condition and improve clinical outcomes for HF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.