ArticleAlpha psychiatry2025
Sex Differences in the Association between Social Support and Major Depression: A Mediation Analysis with Interoception Mediator.
Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcome and psychological outcomes during re-pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social support is recognized as a critical factor in both the prevention and management of Major depression Disorder (MDD), and can influence interoceptive processes. The mechanism of sex differences in the association between social support and MDD has not been clarified. This study was to elucidate the mechanism of sex differences in the association between social support and MDD by a mediation analysis with interoception mediator. Methods: Participants included 390 depressed patients (male/female: 150/240). Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) was used to assess the degree of social support; Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2C) was used to evaluate the interoception; Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was used to assess depression status. The pairwise correlated variables were put into the mediation model for the mediation analysis. Results: The depression status in female depressed patients was more severity than that in male depressed patients, while the social support in female depressed patients was less than that in male depressed patients. In male depressed patients, the Noticing of MAIA-2C plays a partial mediating role in social support and depression status, however, in female depressed patients, the Self-Regulation and Trusting of MAIA-2C plays a partial mediating role in social support and depression status. Conclusions: The female depressed patients receive significantly less social support than male counterparts, contributing to more severe symptoms, with the quality and adequacy of social support being crucial due to its mediation by interoception, highlighting a biological mechanism behind MDD. Differences in how interoception mediating role between genders suggest a physiological reason for the heightened severity of depressive symptoms in females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.