ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Qualitative Study on Cryptogenic Hepatic Encephalopathy Screening Cognition Among Hepatology Medical Care Personnel.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transparent and dynamic network-based risk assessment for development of hepatic encephalopathy.Communications medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we focused on gaining an in-depth understanding on the attitudes and perceptions of hepatology healthcare professionals toward screening for cryptogenic hepatic encephalopathy (CHE), with the goal of providing references for the scientific and standardized implementation of CHE screening. Study Methods: Based on the phenomenological research method, semi-structured in-depth interviews with nine medical professionals were conducted in March 2023 at the department of hepatology of a tertiary hospital in Taizhou city. The collected data was then integrated and analyzed using the Colaizzi seven-step method. Results: Three main themes and seven sub-themes were identified: Inadequate knowledge of relevant information (inadequate knowledge of CHE, inadequate knowledge of neuropsychological test tools for CHE); positive attitudes toward screening for cirrhosis CHE; and screening factors (limited human resources, lack of stringent rules from the management, inability to properly use neuropsychological test tools, lack of cooperation from patients and their families, and lack of auxiliary means of screening). Conclusion: Hepatology medical care personnel had a favorable outlook on CHE screening, however there is room for improvement in both their level of knowledge and clinical work. As a result the administrative departments of hospitals should focus on the factors affecting the clinical work of hepatology medical care personnel and formulate corresponding countermeasures. Emphasis should be placed on the screening and management of CHE for early recognition, early intervention, improvement of quality of life, and effective prevention of hepatic encephalopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.