ReviewJournal of experimental botany2025
Using targeted genome methylation for crop improvement.
Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene Inactivation in Transgenic Plants-A Unique Model for Studying Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms of plant freezing tolerance: from cold signal perception to adaptive responses.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Waterlogging and hypoxia in plant abiotic stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Genome Editing by Grafting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Plant epigenetics: controlling genome expression to integrate developmental and environmental cues.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
- The role of epigenetics in shaping plant-mycorrhizal interactions and ecosystem resilience.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome editing allows scientists to specifically change the DNA sequence of an organism. This powerful technology now fuels basic biology discovery and tangible crop improvement efforts. There is a less well understood layer of information encoded in genomes, known collectively as 'epigenetics', that impacts gene expression, without changing the DNA sequence. Epigenetic processes allow organisms to rapidly respond to environmental fluctuation. Like genome editing, recent advances have demonstrated that it is possible to edit the epigenome of a plant and cause heritable phenotypic changes. In this review, we aim to specifically consider the unique advantages that targeted epigenome editing might provide over existing biotechnology tools. This review is aimed at a broad audience. We begin with a high-level overview of the tools currently available for crop improvement. Next, we present a more detailed overview of the key discoveries that have been made in recent years, primarily using the model system Arabidopsis, new efforts to extend targeted methylation to crop plants, the current status of the technology, and the challenges that remain to realize the full potential of targeted epigenome editing. We end with a forward-looking commentary on how epi-alleles might interface with breeding programs across a variety of crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.