Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111539›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2025

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Development and Application in Neuroscience.

Hugo Geerts

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hugo GeertsCertara Predictive Technologies, Radnor, PA, USA. hugo.geerts@certara.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful clinical development of therapeutics in neurology and psychiatry is challenging due to the complexity of the brain, the lack of validated surrogate markers and the nature of clinical assessments. On the other hand, tremendous advances have been made in unraveling the neurophysiology of the human brain thanks to technical developments in noninvasive biomarkers in both healthy and pathological conditions.Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) aims to integrate this increasing knowledge into a mechanistic model of key biological processes that drive clinical phenotypes with the objective to support research and development of successful therapies. This chapter describes both modeling of molecular pathways resulting in measurable biomarker changes, similar to modeling in other indications, as well as extrapolating in a mechanistic way these biomarker outcomes to predict changes in relevant functional clinical scales.Simulating the effect of therapeutic interventions on clinical scales uses the modeling methodology of computational neurosciences, which is based on the premise that human behavior is driven by firing activity of specific neuronal networks. While driven by pathology, the clinical behavior can also be influenced by various medications and common genotype variants. To address this occurrence, computational neuropharmacology QSP models can be developed and, in principle, applied as virtual twins, which are in silico clones of real patients.Overall, central nervous system (CNS) QSP is an important additional tool for supporting research and development from the preclinical stage to post-marketing studies and clinical practice. Overall, CNS QSP is an important additional tool for supporting research and development from the preclinical stage to post-marketing studies and clinical practice.

Indexed as

NeuropharmacologyNeurosciencesSystems BiologyAnimalsBiomarkersBrainHumansBiomarkersComedicationsComputational neuropharmacologyComputational neurosciencePharmacodynamic interactions

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.