ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
The Oral Microbiome in Diabetes, Arterial Hypertension, and Obesity: A Scoping Review.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of the oxytocinergic system in oral microbiome composition in children with autism: evidence from a randomized controlled trial of intranasal oxytocin.Translational psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Population-scale characterization of the oral microbiome and associations with metabolic health.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Reframing glucolipid metabolic disorders through the lens of the oral microbiome: from pathophysiological mechanisms to translational potential.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Oral and fecal microbiota in Chinese adults with obesity reveal potential niche-specific microbiota associated with obesity.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Factors influencing sialorrhea in orally intubated patients: a lasso and logistic regression analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChanges in the oral microbiome are expected in the presence of chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), arterial hypertension (AH), and obesity (OB).
objectiveWe aimed to map the literature regarding oral microbiome changes in people with T2D, AH, or OB compared to those without these conditions.
methodsThis scoping review was guided by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A search strategy was developed and adapted to five databases (Embase, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and gray literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis). Two reviewers individually screened studies for inclusion. Data from the studies, including the molecular method to evaluate the microbiome and the type of sample, were extracted and analyzed. The focus was significant changes in phylum and genera.
resultsA total of 1413 records were retrieved from databases, 86 from gray literature, and 7 from reference lists. After the screening process, 50 records were included, 28 on T2D, 8 on AH, and 12 on OB. Two studies addressed metabolic syndromes. Most studies identified the oral microbiome in saliva using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
conclusionAt the phylum level, Fusobacteria was enriched in ≥3 studies in people with T2D. Firmicutes enrichment was associated with T2D and OB. Genera enriched in T2D comprised Catonella, Leptotrichia, Prevotella, and Rothia. Aggregatibacter and Prevotella were enriched in OB. No phylum or genera were consistently enriched in AH.OSF protocol registration: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/XK72V (available at https://osf.io/z5fp4 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40111694What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.