Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40111722›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

Computational model of coarctation of the aorta in rabbits suggests persistent ascending aortic remodeling post-correction.

Ashley A Hiebing, Matthew A Culver, John F LaDisa, Colleen M Witzenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley A HiebingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew A CulverDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
John F LaDisaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Colleen M WitzenburgDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. witzenburg@wisc.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of morbidity after correcting aortic coarctations of varying severityR01HL142955 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI John Frank LaDisa · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
Quantifying altered hemodynamics in response to stenting for aortic coarctationR15HL096096 · NHLBI · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI LADISA, JOHN FRANK · 2009 to 2009
$228k
Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Endowment Project #5520519American Heart Association 15GRNT25700042American Heart Association 20CDA35210754National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship ProgramNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142955NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL142955NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL096096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is a common congenital cardiovascular lesion that presents as a localized narrowing of the proximal descending aorta. While improvements in surgical and catheter-based techniques have increased short-term survival, there is a high long-term risk of hypertension and a reduced average lifespan despite correction. Computational models can be used to estimate aortic remodeling and peripheral vascular compensation, potentially serving as key tools in developing a mechanistic understanding of the interplay between pre-treatment dynamics, post-treatment recovery, and long-term hypertension risk. In this study, we developed a lumped-parameter model of the heart and circulation to simulate CoA. After fitting model parameters using imaging and catheterization data from healthy rabbits, we then used the model to estimate differences in ascending aortic compliance and peripheral resistance between the healthy group and rabbits with both untreated and corrected CoA using their imaging and catheterization data. CoA was defined by the current putative clinical treatment threshold (a pressure gradient > 20 mm Hg). Model inputs were fitted such that outputs matched reported stroke volume, ejection fraction, systolic and diastolic aortic pressure, peak aortic flow, mean and peak blood pressure gradients, and upper-to-lower body flow split, with all results falling within one standard deviation of the data for all groups. In the untreated CoA and corrected simulations, a decrease in ascending aortic compliance was necessary to match reported hemodynamics. This suggests exposure to a pressure gradient > 20 mm Hg results in vascular remodeling that persists after repair, a process strongly correlated with hypertension.

Indexed as

AortaAortic CoarctationComputer SimulationModels, CardiovascularVascular RemodelingAnimalsBlood PressureHemodynamicsRabbitsAortic coarctationAortic complianceCongenital heart defectHypertensionHypertrophyLumped parameter

Identifiers

PMID40111722
PMCPMC12797878

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.