ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Computational model of coarctation of the aorta in rabbits suggests persistent ascending aortic remodeling post-correction.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is a common congenital cardiovascular lesion that presents as a localized narrowing of the proximal descending aorta. While improvements in surgical and catheter-based techniques have increased short-term survival, there is a high long-term risk of hypertension and a reduced average lifespan despite correction. Computational models can be used to estimate aortic remodeling and peripheral vascular compensation, potentially serving as key tools in developing a mechanistic understanding of the interplay between pre-treatment dynamics, post-treatment recovery, and long-term hypertension risk. In this study, we developed a lumped-parameter model of the heart and circulation to simulate CoA. After fitting model parameters using imaging and catheterization data from healthy rabbits, we then used the model to estimate differences in ascending aortic compliance and peripheral resistance between the healthy group and rabbits with both untreated and corrected CoA using their imaging and catheterization data. CoA was defined by the current putative clinical treatment threshold (a pressure gradient > 20 mm Hg). Model inputs were fitted such that outputs matched reported stroke volume, ejection fraction, systolic and diastolic aortic pressure, peak aortic flow, mean and peak blood pressure gradients, and upper-to-lower body flow split, with all results falling within one standard deviation of the data for all groups. In the untreated CoA and corrected simulations, a decrease in ascending aortic compliance was necessary to match reported hemodynamics. This suggests exposure to a pressure gradient > 20 mm Hg results in vascular remodeling that persists after repair, a process strongly correlated with hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.