ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2025
A real-world study of sirolimus in the treatment of pediatric head and neck lymphatic malformations.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A national multicenter analysis of hospitalization admission records for lymphatic malformation in China from 2016 to 2023.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSirolimus has shown promise in treating lymphatic malformations (LMs); however, previous studies were all single-arm clinical trials. Prior studies have reported that some LMs lesions can spontaneously reduce, which poses a potential confounding factor in evaluating therapeutic outcomes. Our study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral sirolimus objectively for LMs in the head and neck by comparing the outcomes in a control group.
methodsThis real-world study involved 57 children with LMs from 2020 to 2023 at Beijing Children's Hospital. The patients were divided into nonintervention and oral sirolimus groups. The primary outcome was lesion volume change on magnetic resonance imaging, and the secondary outcome was improvement in clinical symptoms. Safety was assessed based on adverse reactions (regular laboratory tests and patient follow-ups) and sirolimus blood concentrations in the oral sirolimus group.
resultsTwenty-one children were enrolled in the nonintervention group (14 male and 7 female), with a median age of 33 months (interquartile range [IQR], 9-53.5 months); 36 children were enrolled in the oral sirolimus group (15 male and 21 female), with a median age of 24 months (IQR, 7.5-51.25 months). The median volume reduction ratio in the nonintervention group was 0.08 (IQR, 0.30-0.40), and eight cases (38.1%) had an effective response. The median volume reduction ratio in the oral sirolimus group was 0.67 (IQR, 0.40-0.92), and 33 cases (91.7%) had an effective response. Clinical symptoms improved in 9 children (42.9%) in the nonintervention group and 35 (97.2%) in the oral sirolimus group. The effective rate and volume changes differed statistically significantly (P < .001). The most common adverse reaction in the oral sirolimus group was an increase in myocardial enzyme levels (n = 23 [63.9%]), followed by oral ulcers (n = 16 [44.4%]). The overall blood concentration of sirolimus was low during the drug administration in the oral sirolimus group, among which 10 children (27.8%) had a mean blood concentration of <5 ng/mL.
conclusionsSirolimus significantly decreased lesion volume and improved clinical symptoms in most patients with LMs, especially those with macrocystic components. Conservative observations were only helpful in some patients, with relatively modest volume changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.