ArticleScientific reports2025
Direct 3-D printing of complex optical phantoms using dynamic filament mixing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical phantoms for the characterization and validation of imaging and spectroscopy: a review.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Review
- A Cost-Effective 3D-Printed Conductive Phantom for EEG Sensing System Validation: Development, Performance Evaluation, and Comparison with State-of-the-Art Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report a method to directly 3-D print complex heterogeneous optical phantoms with programmable tissue-mimicking absorption and scattering properties. The proposed approach utilizes commercially available multi-color mixing extruders and off-the-shelf polylactic acid filaments, making this technique low-cost and broadly accessible. We systematically characterized optical properties, including both absorption and reduced scattering coefficients, at a wide range of mixing ratios of gray, white, and translucent filaments and validated our hypothesis of a linear-mixing model between the filament mixing ratios and the resulting optical properties. Various techniques were used to design and fabricate sophisticated solid phantoms, including the design of color-purging towers, and the optimization of several printing parameters to improve print quality. To demonstrate the feasibility of this technique for generating anatomically complex phantoms with tunable optical absorption and scattering properties within tissue-relevant ranges, we designed and fabricated three heterogeneous optical phantoms. One of the presented phantoms was specifically designed to support quality assurance efforts in evaluating diffuse optics instruments and methodologies across various institutions. We have characterized the printed phantoms and observed an average error between 12%-15% compared to our linear-mixing model-predicted values. Future studies will target the usage of additional filament materials to expand potential imaging applications.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.