ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025
Practice in evaluating solid organ transplant candidates and recipients with neurological impairment: The European Academy of Neurology neurocritical care panel survey.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practice in evaluating solid organ transplant candidates and recipients with neurological impairment: The European Academy of Neurology neurocritical care panel survey.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain disorders can occur in the context of peripheral organ diseases as well as solid organ transplants. The aim of this study was to explore the involvement of neurologists in the evaluation and management of solid organ transplant candidates and recipients when a nervous system impairment co-exists.
methodsWe invited all European Academy of Neurology members to answer a web-based survey. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results.
resultsIn total, 176 respondents completed the survey; neurologists are more involved in the evaluation of neurological complications after (31.8%) than before an organ transplant (21%), when they see a small volume of patients, and mainly for neurological comorbidities. A minority (9%) of neurologists received a specific training on the topic of neurological manifestations of extracranial conditions as well as only 6.2% of them are involved in research activities in the brain-body interactions field.
conclusionThis survey highlights a mismatch between the impressive statistics on brain dysfunction in peripheral organ diseases as well as transplant and the small volume of solid organ transplant candidates/recipients seen by neurologists. According to recent recommendations every organ-eligible candidates should undergo a cognitive screening, however, it is not common that neurologists are involved in the multidisciplinary committee to determine the transplant eligibility. Delirium is the most frequent reason for a neurological consultation after a transplant, but also other critical brain conditions. Educational programs in the field of neurology of systemic diseases are worth being implemented as well as including neurologists in research programs on brain-body interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.