ArticleAsiaIntervention2025
A real-world experience with a thin-strut bioresorbable vascular scaffold system: a single-centre study.
Article in AsiaIntervention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07038408 (Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized Study to Show Long-term Efficacy of DCB Treatment With Bail-out BRS in Comparison to BRS Treatment of De-novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions in a Relatively Young PCI Population.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized Study to Show Long-term Efficacy of DCB Treatment With Bail-out BRS in Comparison to BRS Treatment of De-novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions in a Relatively Young PCI Population.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the significant advancements in interventional cardiology, there is a need for new, metal-free bioresorbable stent systems that preserve the vasomotor function of the treated vessel and decrease the risk of restenosis associated with metal stents and the risk of thrombosis associated with first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the MeRes100 bioresorbable scaffold in complex Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study that included 86 patients with coronary artery disease who had been implanted with a next-generation MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system and followed up to 12 months after the procedure. Results: The scaffold was successfully delivered to the target lesion with satisfactory stent expansion in 98.84% of cases. Only one patient died, and the in-hospital mortality rate was as low as 1.16% (cardiac death). No cases of major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation, or scaffold thrombosis were reported during the follow-up. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest that the thin-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold appears to be a clinically acceptable, safe, reliable and reproducible strategy to treat both
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.