ArticleAJOG global reports2025
Effects of the sampling time on the vaginal microbiota in healthy pregnant women: a prospective observational study.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- VaginalJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies using 16S rRNA gene sequencing have extensively examined the vaginal microbiota changes of pregnant women. However, no study has examined these changes considering the time of day at which vaginal fluid samples were collected from near-term pregnant women. Objective: To describe the vaginal microbiota of Japanese near-term pregnant women with normal pregnancy outcomes and potential vaginal microbiota changes from wake-up to bedtime. Study design: In this prospective observational study, vaginal swab specimens were obtained from healthy near-term pregnant women twice on the same day, after waking up and before bedtime. All specimens were examined for total bacterial cell count per gram of vaginal fluid, Nugent score, pH, and vaginal microbiota analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Initially, the wake-up and bedtime samples of all participants were analyzed at the genus level using next-generation sequencing. Subsequently, all samples were analyzed at the genus and species levels using Sanger sequencing. Results: Sixteen pregnant women were enrolled in this study. The median age of the participants was 32.5 years, and the median gestational age was 38 weeks. Median bacterial counts in vaginal fluids at wake-up and bedtime were 3.9 × 10 Conclusions: The vaginal microbiota of pregnant women with normal pregnancy outcomes was not necessarily dominated by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.