Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115033›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2025

An international survey on the geographical differences in practice patterns and training of endoscopic ultrasound.

Tobias Kleemann, Robert Freund, Barbara Braden, Michael Hocke, Stephan Hollerbach, Christian Jenssen, Kathleen Möller, Yi Dong, Manoop Singh Bhutani, Masayuki Kitano and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tobias KleemannDepartment of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus 03048, Germany.
Robert FreundThiem Research, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus 03048, Germany.
Barbara BradenTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Michael HockeDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Helios Hospital Meiningen, Meiningen 98617, Germany.
Stephan HollerbachDepartment of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Celle 29223, Germany.
Christian JenssenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg 15344, Germany.
Kathleen MöllerMedical Department I/Gastroenterology, Sana Hospital Lichtenberg, Berlin 10365, Germany.
Yi DongDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Manoop Singh BhutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Masayuki KitanoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan.
Siyu SunEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Abed El-LehibiGastroenterology & Hepatology Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Christoph Frank DietrichDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinics Beau-Site, Salem, and Permanence, Bern 3013, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Recently, a series of publications discuss what kind of clinical and technical information is important to know before performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examinations. This paper aims to investigate variations in the performance of EUS examinations in different countries worldwide to present views and experiences on the use of pre-EUS investigations. Methods: In a multinational and multidisciplinary survey, more than 100 practicing EUS endoscopists were surveyed by a questionnaire asking for their level of education and training, their experience in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, preferred technical use and procedural steps before EUS examination. Substantial geographic variation not only in the level of training and mandatory imaging prior to EUS, but consequently also in the standards and practice of EUS examinations and advanced EUS guided therapeutic procedures were observed. The participants' preferences regarding technical use and procedural steps prior to EUS examinations were assessed according to their level of education and training experience. Results: Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) is performed prior to EUS by the EUS endoscopists themselves in most European countries but not in North and South Americas where non-invasive pre-EUS imaging is delegated to other specialties such as radiology. Different training backgrounds, cultural beliefs, infrastructures, available equipment and access to training programs have a strong impact on the EUS workforce and EUS procedural practice across the continents. Conclusions: The study results suggest existence of relevant geographical differences that reflect not only the different levels of education in different settings but also differences regarding technical standards for the performance of EUS and TUS examinations worldwide.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasoundendoscopistsgeographical differencesprocedural practice

Identifiers

PMID40115033
PMCPMC11921813

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.