ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2025
An international survey on the geographical differences in practice patterns and training of endoscopic ultrasound.
Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mimicking a submucosal tumor: endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of multiple mucosa-encapsulated fecaliths in the rectum.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- Echoendoscopic evaluation of the vascular pattern of solid pancreatic lesions as a predictor of neuroendocrine neoplasms: a retrospective study in Mexico.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Validation of multiple deep learning models for colorectal tumor differentiation with endoscopic ultrasound images: a dual-center study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Recently, a series of publications discuss what kind of clinical and technical information is important to know before performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examinations. This paper aims to investigate variations in the performance of EUS examinations in different countries worldwide to present views and experiences on the use of pre-EUS investigations. Methods: In a multinational and multidisciplinary survey, more than 100 practicing EUS endoscopists were surveyed by a questionnaire asking for their level of education and training, their experience in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, preferred technical use and procedural steps before EUS examination. Substantial geographic variation not only in the level of training and mandatory imaging prior to EUS, but consequently also in the standards and practice of EUS examinations and advanced EUS guided therapeutic procedures were observed. The participants' preferences regarding technical use and procedural steps prior to EUS examinations were assessed according to their level of education and training experience. Results: Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) is performed prior to EUS by the EUS endoscopists themselves in most European countries but not in North and South Americas where non-invasive pre-EUS imaging is delegated to other specialties such as radiology. Different training backgrounds, cultural beliefs, infrastructures, available equipment and access to training programs have a strong impact on the EUS workforce and EUS procedural practice across the continents. Conclusions: The study results suggest existence of relevant geographical differences that reflect not only the different levels of education in different settings but also differences regarding technical standards for the performance of EUS and TUS examinations worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.