ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2025
Stakeholder-driven multi-stage adaptive real-world theme-oriented (SMART) telehealth evaluation framework: a scoping review.
Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating trust into artificial intelligence for medicine: using diabetes as the exemplar disease.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Evolving roles of Data Coordinating Centers in multisite research: Challenges and adaptations from a rapid scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telehealth has revolutionized healthcare delivery by integrating cutting-edge technologies, yet evaluations of its services and programs often lack comprehensive frameworks, resulting in unclear standards for quality assurance. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of telehealth evaluation frameworks applicable to the United States healthcare system, following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and a published protocol. Twelve telehealth evaluation frameworks published between 2019 and 2023 were identified, focusing on four key themes: program implementation, clinical impact, economic impact, and equity. Guided through two auxiliary frameworks, we further developed a stakeholder-driven multi-stage adaptive real-world theme-oriented (SMART) conceptual framework for telehealth evaluation. We illustrated this framework through a use case on a remote patient monitoring program. This comprehensive telehealth evaluation framework not only facilitates stakeholders in developing tailored evaluation plans but also contributes to the standardization and enhancement of telehealth services, ultimately improving health outcomes and promoting greater equity across society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.