Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40115828›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Acute whole-body vibration as a recovery strategy did not alter the content of gluteus medius monocarboxylate-transporters, lactatemia, and acidosis induced by intense exercise in horses.

Júlia Ribeiro Garcia Carvalho, Nathali Adrielli Agassi Sales, Thayssa Oliveira Littiere, Guilherme Barbosa Costa, Catarina Mariano Castro, Emanuel Elias Camolese Polisel, Juan Bordon Orsi, Gabriel Vieira Ramos, Ivan Felismino Charas Santos, Claudio Alexandre Gobatto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Júlia Ribeiro Garcia CarvalhoLaboratory of Equine Exercise Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nathali Adrielli Agassi SalesLaboratory of Equine Exercise Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thayssa Oliveira LittiereLaboratory of Equine Exercise Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme Barbosa CostaLaboratory of Equine Exercise Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Catarina Mariano CastroLaboratory of Equine Exercise Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Emanuel Elias Camolese PoliselLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology, School of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas, FCA/UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juan Bordon OrsiLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology, School of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas, FCA/UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel Vieira RamosEquine Sports Medicine Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ivan Felismino Charas SantosAcademic Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rondônia, UNIR, Rolim de Moura, Rondônia, Brazil.
Claudio Alexandre GobattoLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology, School of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas, FCA/UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fúlvia Barros Manchado-GobattoLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology, School of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas, FCA/UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme Camargo FerrazLaboratory of Equine Exercise Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have explored alternatives to enhance the performance, health, and safety of sports horses. One promising method involves the use of vibrating platforms (VP), which offer passive exercise stimulation via mechanical oscillations distributed throughout the body. This type of exercise is referred to as whole-body vibration (WBV) and is an emerging strategy for accelerating muscle recovery. This study examined the dynamics of proteins responsible for transporting monocarboxylates (MCT1 and MCT4), and their relationship with lactatemia and acid-base balance in connection with WBV recovery following intense treadmill exercise in horses. Methods: Eight crossbred horses underwent the standardized exercise test on the treadmill to determine the velocity corresponding to the lactate threshold. This velocity was used to prescribe the external load of the acute intense exercise bout (AIEB), which was performed to recruit rapidly fatigable type II muscle fibers and induce hyperlactatemia and metabolic acidosis. The horses were assigned to three experimental groups in a crossover design, with a 7-day washout period. The treadmill group (TG) actively recovered through low-intensity treadmill walking. The WBV group (WBVG) followed a stepwise recovery protocol on VP, with each step lasting 2 min and the frequencies decreasing in a specific order: 76, 66, 55, 46, and 32 Hz. The sham group (SG) was designated for horses with the VP turned off. All groups experienced a uniform recovery strategy duration of 10 min. Heart rate (HR), rectal temperature (RT), lactatemia, glycemia, acid-base status and electrolytes, strong ion difference (SID), and muscle monocarboxylate transporters (MCT1 and MCT4), were assessed. Results: AIEB induced positive chronotropic effects, hyperlactatemia and moderate metabolic acidosis in all experimental groups. All groups also showed transitory hyperthermia, hyperglycemia, hypernatremia, hyperchloremia, hyperkalemia and SID reduction. HR was higher in TG than in the WBVG and SG immediately after the recovery procedures. Between the groups, there was no change in RT, lactatemia, glycemia and MCT1 and MCT4 content. Regardless of groups, the MCT4 content decreased 3 and 6 h after recovery strategies. Discussion: It was concluded that a single whole-body vibration session did not enhance recovery of lactatemia or acid-base balance in horses after intense treadmill exercise.

Indexed as

acid-base balancecool-downexerciseheart ratelactateMCT1MCT4whole-body vibration

Identifiers

PMID40115828
PMCPMC11925038

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.