ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
New onset diabetes predicts clinical outcomes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Distinct prognostic impact of diabetes subtypes, metformin use, and glycemic control in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- To develop prognostic markers related to drug resistance in pancreatic cancer patients based on multiple machine learning methods.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Impact of new onset diabetes on pancreatic cancer outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One percent of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are diagnosed with new onset diabetes (NOD) over the age of 50 years within 3 years. Therefore, NOD is a major factor for early diagnosis of PDAC. Research has focused on understanding the differences between NOD and type 2 diabetes, particularly in relation to PDAC. However, conflicting data exists regarding their impact on survival outcomes in PDAC patients. We performed this multi-center study to assess the prevalence and influence of NOD on clinical outcomes in patients with PDAC within a community-based hospital system. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 138 patients with biopsy-proven PDAC with localized/borderline disease (n=70), and metastatic disease (n=68) at three institutions from 2014 to 2021. NOD group consisted of pts diagnosed with diabetes [hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >6.5%] or pre-diabetes (HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) within the 3 years prior to PDAC diagnosis. Primary aim of the study was to determine the impact of NOD on clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 138 patients were included in the study, from which 30 met the criteria for NOD. No significant differences were noted in the demographic and clinical characteristics comparing patients based on NOD history. Comparing survival outcomes, NOD group was associated with worse overall survival (OS) in both the metastatic cohort [n=68, progression-free survival (PFS) 4.6 Conclusions: NOD is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with metastatic and resected PDAC. Reduction of BMI prior to diagnosis of NOD, warrants further investigation to be incorporated into the PDAC screening paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.