ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2025
MRI-Extracellular Volume Fraction Versus Histological Amyloid Load in Cardiac Amyloidosis: The Importance of T2 Mapping.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating natural history and treatment response in cardiac amyloidosis: the evolving role of multimodality imaging.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2026Review
- Multidimensional cardiac functional phenotyping beyond ejection fraction: a multimodality imaging framework for cardiovascular care.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac Amyloidosis: Tribulations and New Frontiers.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Advances in imaging-based diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment in cardiac amyloidosis: a comprehensive multimodality review.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Toward Multiparametric MRI to Unravel Myocardial Pathology in Cardiac Amyloidosis.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) is elevated in the presence of fibrosis, amyloid deposition, inflammation, and edema. In patients with cardiac amyloidosis and prolonged T2 due to concomitant inflammation or edema, MRI-ECV may not correctly reflect histological amyloid load. The authors sought to determine whether MRI-ECV can accurately reflect histological amyloid load in 2 groups of patients with wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt-CM), with and without T2 prolongation.
methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive patients with ATTRwt-CM who underwent endomyocardial biopsy and cardiac MRI from March 2017 to October 2021 for initial evaluation of ATTRwt-CM. We measured MRI-ECV and T2, and evaluated correlation between MRI-ECV and amyloid load from endomyocardial biopsy by means of Pearson correlation analysis.
resultsOf 44 patients (mean age, 75±6 years [SD]; 40 men), 24 showed T2 prolongation (T2≥50 milliseconds). All specimens obtained by endomyocardial biopsy were suitable for analysis. The interval between endomyocardial biopsy and cardiac MRI examination was a median of 3 days (interquartile range, 2-4). In the absence of T2 prolongation due to increased water content, MRI-ECV and amyloid load showed a moderately significant correlation (Spearman ρ=0.50,
conclusionsIn patients with ATTRwt-CM and prolonged T2, MRI-ECV did not accurately reflect histological amyloid load. Our findings underscore the need for a multiparametric imaging approach, combining both ECV and T2 mapping, to better characterize myocardial tissue in patients with ATTRwt-CM, and further prospective research in larger and more diverse cohorts is needed to validate our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40116000What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.