Evidence mapPaperPMID 40116013Full record

ArticleThe science of diabetes self-management and care2025

Intermittent Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes Is Preferred: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences.

Bente Elisabeth Bendixen, Ane Wilhelmsen-Langeland, Kirsten Lomborg, Eirin Måkestad, Marjolein M Iversen, Eirik Søfteland, Anne Haugstvedt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The science of diabetes self-management and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bente Elisabeth BendixenDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.ORCID 0009-0007-9912-9523
Ane Wilhelmsen-LangelandDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
Kirsten LomborgDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5809-3508
Eirin MåkestadDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Marjolein M IversenDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
Eirik SøftelandDepartment of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Anne HaugstvedtDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to explore experiences with use of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).MethodsA qualitative study with individual semistructured interviews at 2 time points was conducted; first with 14 adults, ages 45 to 74 years (8 women) and second with 9 of the first interviewed adults (5 women) approximately 2 years later. Participants used CGM before, during, and 3 months after the concentrated group intervention. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed interviews.ResultsThree main themes were identified regarding the use of CGMs: (1) a gamechanger in diabetes education, (2) intermittent use is preferred, and (3) a balancing act. The participants described the use of CGMs as a valuable tool in diabetes education. It increased their understanding of insulin demand and sensitivity and strengthened their awareness of how to make more health-promoting micro-choices in everyday life. Intermittent use was described as the preferred way of using CGMs. Some experienced that CGMs could be challenging, and in periods of satisfactory glucose control, CGM use was experienced as unnecessary, underpinning intermittent use as appropriate.ConclusionStudy findings showed that participants with T2DM experienced CGMs as a valuable tool to gain deeper understanding of processes in the body, which could improve diabetes self-management. CGMs can facilitate more healthy micro-choices in life. Intermittent use of CGMs is most often the preferred approach for people with T2DM, but access to CGMs should take individual preferences into consideration.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Patient PreferenceAgedContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleGlycemic ControlHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicQualitative ResearchBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID40116013
PMCPMC12127601

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.