Trial reportHIV medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in Black and Hispanic/Latine adults with HIV-1 initiating first-line therapy: 5-year follow-up from two phase III studies.
Trial report in HIV medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GS-9883/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GS-9883/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBlack and Hispanic/Latine people are disproportionately affected by HIV-1 and may have a greater risk of comorbidities than non-Black and non-Hispanic/Latine people with HIV. However, they have historically been underrepresented in HIV clinical studies. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of first-line antiretroviral therapy with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) over 5 years in Black and Hispanic/Latine people with HIV.
methodsWe present two post hoc pooled analyses of participants who received B/F/TAF up to week 240 in studies 1489 (NCT02607930) and 1490 (NCT02607956). Outcomes were compared between self-identified Black and non-Black participants and between Hispanic/Latine and non-Hispanic/Latine participants, including baseline characteristics, proportion with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, change in CD4 cell count, adherence, changes in metabolic parameters, and treatment-emergent adverse events.
resultsOverall, 211 Black, 421 non-Black, 155 Hispanic/Latine, and 477 non-Hispanic/Latine participants received B/F/TAF up to week 240. At baseline, median ages were 30-34 years, and 84%-91% were male at birth. At week 240, high proportions of Black (97%), non-Black (99%), Hispanic/Latine (100%), and non-Hispanic/Latine (98%) participants had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Black people with HIV were more likely than non-Black people with HIV to have low (<85%) adherence (11% vs. 5%; p = 0.0074). Changes in CD4 count, metabolic and renal parameters, and treatment-emergent hypertension and diabetes were generally similar between Black and non-Black and Hispanic/Latine and non-Hispanic/Latine participants. A smaller proportion of Black than non-Black people with HIV experienced study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (20% vs. 32%; p = 0.0026).
conclusionsThese results demonstrate the durability and long-term safety of B/F/TAF in Black and Hispanic/Latine people with HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.