Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has made significant efforts to promote age-friendly community initiatives (AFCI) to address the challenges of population aging. Previous studies have discussed the construction of age-friendly communities (AFC) in urban cities, evaluating AFCs often rooted in the WHO's Checklist and focused on a single group, namely older adults, overlooking the role of other age groups in community development. Objective: This study aims to evaluate AFCs from multidimensional aspects, particularly the positive living experiences of older adults, summarize the deficiencies in both hardware and software aspects in the process of constructing AFCs in China, and provide some recommendations to promote AFCIs worldwide. Methods: Using a multistage sampling strategy, 470 community residents from urban and suburban areas participated in this study. A self-designed questionnaire was designed to use a standardized method to evaluate older adults' living experiences across five dimensions, including the degree of age-friendliness in the community, social support, sense of gain, sense of happiness, and sense of security. Respondents rated each dimension on a 10-point scale. This study defined community residents into 3 groups: residents younger than 45 years(Group 1: youth), those aged 45-59 years (Group 2: middle-aged), and those aged ≥60 years (Group 3: old-age). Results: In this study, 382 (81.3%) community residents were unaware of the relevant concepts of AFCs. Most participants highlighted the importance of community support and health services, followed by respect and social inclusion, and outdoor spaces and buildings. The findings showed that the highest-rated dimension was the sense of security. The mean scores for the degree of the sense of security in urban and suburban areas were 7.88 (SD 1.776) and 7.73 (SD 1.853), respectively. For Group 2, the mean scores were 7.60 (SD 2.070) and 8.03 (SD 1.662), while Group 3 had mean scores of 7.34 (SD 2.004) and 7.91 (SD 1.940). The lowest-rated dimension was social support; the mean scores for Group 1 for the degree of social support in urban and suburban areas were 7.63 (SD 1.835) and 7.48 (SD 1.918), respectively. For Group 2, the mean scores were 6.94 (SD 2.087) and 7.36 (SD 2.228), while those for Group 3 were 6.37 (SD 2.299) and 6.84 (SD 2.062). Further, there were significant differences in the scores of residents among different age groups in urban areas regarding age-friendliness (P<.001), social support, (P<.001), and sense of gain (P=.01). Conclusions: China is in the early stages of developing AFCs. We further highlight the importance of continued research on the collaboration and participation among multiple stakeholders. These outcomes have a direct and positive impact on the well-being of older adults.