SynthesisEuropean journal of cardiovascular nursing2025
Identifying barriers and enablers to cardiac rehabilitation participation and completion unique to South Asian individuals: a qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of cardiovascular nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Modern Era: Evidence, Equity, and Evolving Delivery Models Across the Cardiovascular Spectrum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predictive Value of the CHAAdvances in rehabilitation science and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsSouth Asian individuals living outside the Indian subcontinent are under-represented in cardiac rehabilitation (CR), despite facing higher rates of cardiac-related mortality and hospitalizations compared with White ethnic groups. Understanding how cultural differences affect CR participation and completion after referral requires the examination of barriers and enablers specific to South Asian populations. This review aims to summarize evidence on barriers and enablers to CR for South Asian minorities outside the Indian subcontinent. METHODS AND
resultsA systematic review of six databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science) was conducted in January 2024 (updated November 2024), with no language or date limitations. Studies from countries outside the Indian subcontinent were included. Barriers and enablers were identified, followed by thematic analysis. Thirteen studies (n = 384 South Asian participants) from the UK (n = 10) and Canada (n = 3) were included. Five key themes were generated: (i) communication and knowledge, (ii) motivation to attend CR or follow medical advice, (iii) religion, (iv) programme delivery, and (v) practical considerations. Key factors influencing CR participation included language barriers, family support, fatalistic beliefs, and motivation. Each theme encapsulates barriers and enablers and shapes participation at both service and patient level. While some barriers were common across different ethnic groups, they had stronger impact on South Asians due to distinct social determinants of health.
conclusionBarriers and enablers are closely linked to cultural and societal norms. Recognizing these factors enables CR services to better address the needs of underserved populations, ensuring equitable healthcare provision and support. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023482611.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.