ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Changes in Youth Cholesterol Screening Rates in an Academic Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dyslipidemia in Lebanese children and adolescents: parents' knowledge and practices.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Lebanese physicians on the screening of pediatric dyslipidemias: a KAP cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Screening youth for hypercholesterolemia allows for detection of familial hypercholesterolemia that can predispose to premature heart disease, however guidelines provide conflicting recommendations regarding universal cholesterol screening. The COVID-19 pandemic and the perception of conflicting guideline recommendations (2011 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines and United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations in 2016 and 2023) may have adversely affected youth cholesterol screening rates. This study examines screening rates during and after the COVID-19 pandemic and the most recent guideline update. Electronic health record data from a single academic institution was used to calculate Order Placement Rates (OPRs) for subjects aged 8 years 9 months-21 years from 3/18/2019 to 12/31/2023. Demographic data included subject sex, age, zip code, and primary provider's specialty. Zip codes were categorized as rural/urban and underserved/middle/advantaged. The study period was divided into five stages (pre-pandemic, mid-pandemic, late-pandemic, post-pandemic, and post-guideline). Relative to baseline OPR prior to 3/18/2019, study period OPRs decreased slightly in pre-pandemic (73.3%), mid-pandemic (70.9%), and late-pandemic (65.4%) stages, with sharper declines during post-pandemic (47.6%) and post-guideline stages (35.2%). OPR decreased more significantly for youth 9-11 years than 17-21 years (post-guideline OPR: 35.1% versus 46.9%). Urban underserved and urban advantaged had higher OPRs. OPRs for family medicine and pediatrics declined (p < 0.01), more significantly in pediatrics (post-guideline versus pre-pandemic OPR adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.03 [0.02-0.04] for pediatrics, 0.35 [0.30-0.40] for family medicine). Our institution showed decreases in cholesterol screening OPRs after both the COVID-19 pandemic and guideline update. OPRs dropped most significantly among youth aged 9-11 years and among pediatric providers. Urban youth were more likely to be screened than rural youth. Discrepancies persist among access to youth cholesterol screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40116884What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.