Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40116964›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2025

Integrating QSP and ML to Facilitate Drug Development and Personalized Medicine.

Tongli Zhang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tongli ZhangUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. zhangtl@ucmail.uc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this chapter, the potential integration between quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) and machine learning (ML) is explored. ML models are in their nature "black boxes", since they make predictions based on data without explicit system definitions, while on the other hand, QSP models are "white boxes" that describe mechanistic biological interactions and investigate the systems properties emerging from such interactions. Despite their differences, both approaches have unique strengths that can be leveraged to form a powerful integrated tool. ML's ability to handle large datasets and make predictions is complemented by QSP's detailed mechanistic insights into drug actions and biological systems. The chapter discusses basic ML techniques and their application in drug development, including supervised and unsupervised learning methods. It also illustrates how combining QSP with ML can facilitate the design of combination therapies against cancer resistance to single therapies. The synergy between these two methodologies shows promise to accelerate the drug development process, making it more efficient and tailored to individual patient needs.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentMachine LearningPrecision MedicineAnimalsHumansCancer resistanceCombination therapiesDrug developmentMachine Learning (ML)Personalized medicineQuantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP)

Identifiers

PMID40116964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.