ArticleFuture cardiology2025
Observational protocol on neuropsychological disorders in cardiovascular disease for holistic prevention and treatment.
Article in Future cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychic and Cognitive Impacts of Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence from an Observational Study and Comparison by a Systematic Literature Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Cardiorenal Syndrome and Heart Failure: A Preliminary Study of Clinical, Cognitive, and Emotional Aspects.NeuroSci · 2025Article
- Brain Neurotrophins and Plant Polyphenols: A Powerful Connection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. In view of the close correlation between the functions of the body, which cannot be examined in a piecemeal manner but as an integrated system, a holistic approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of the patient. Our study aims to (i) examine the connection between CVD and cognitive deficits; (ii) examine the presence of anxiety and depression; (iii) evaluate the presence of dysphagia, pneumophonic coordination disorders, respiratory and sleep disorders; (iv) analyze the impact of CVD on the caregiver; and (v) evaluate the effectiveness of psychoeducational intervention. At least 218 patients will participate in the survey. At T0, they will undergo neuropsychological, psychological and associated clinical condition assessment through standardized tests. In addition, at least one psychoeducation meeting will be held. After 6 months (T1), the same tests will be repeated, and the effectiveness of psychoeducation will be evaluated. Assessment of associated disorders will provide a comprehensive view of the patient. In addition, it will be observed how psychoeducational intervention can make changes on general well-being. Comprehensive, multi-step observation allows for identification of risk factors, tailoring of treatment, and prevention of future complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.