ArticleBMJ open2025
Changing primary care capacity in Canada: protocol for a cross-provincial mixed methods study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends in access to primary care among Canadian older adults before, during, and following the COVID-19 public health emergency.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite having more family physicians (FPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) per capita than ever before in Canada, there is a clear gap between population primary care needs and system capacity. Primary care needs may be shaped by population ageing, increasing clinical and social complexity and growing service intensity. System capacity may be shaped by falling practice volumes, increasing administrative workload, changing clinician demographics and new health system roles (eg, hospitalist and focused practices). These changing factors could contribute to reduced patient access to primary care, worsened health inequities and stress and overwork among primary care clinicians. Workforce planning tools used in most countries do not adequately consider these factors. Our study will identify and explore factors shaping population service use and system capacity over time and develop planning tools to estimate future primary care needs and capacity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will interview FPs and NPs about factors shaping workload, including patient characteristics, practice expectations and system context. This will inform analysis of administrative data to describe factors shaping primary care need (patient demographics, clinical and social complexity, service intensity) and capacity (provider supply, demographics, service volume, roles) over a 20-year period from 2004/2005 to 2023/2024. Qualitative and quantitative findings will inform analytical models that project and compare need and capacity under stakeholder-informed scenarios. The study includes the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, provinces with varied policy and population contexts and complementary administrative health data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics board (REB) approval for the qualitative study has been provided by Research Ethics BC, with subsequent approvals from Horizon Health Network, Nova Scotia Health, University of Manitoba and University of Ottawa. REB approval for analysis of linked administrative data was obtained from the Nova Scotia Health REB, Research Ethics BC, University of Manitoba and University of New Brunswick. Our findings will support primary care capacity planning to equitably meet the needs of a growing and ageing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.