Evidence mapPaperPMID 40118474Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Changing primary care capacity in Canada: protocol for a cross-provincial mixed methods study.

M Ruth Lavergne, Julie Easley, Agnes Grudniewicz, Lindsay Hedden, Ted McDonald, David Rudoler, Antoine Sauré, Rebecca H Correia, Émilie Dufour, François Gallant and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

M Ruth LavergneDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada ruth.lavergne@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-4600
Julie EasleyDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Agnes GrudniewiczTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2960-8178
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Ted McDonaldPolitical Science, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
David RudolerFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-5829
Antoine SauréTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rebecca H CorreiaDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Émilie DufourNursing, Universite de Montreal Faculte des sciences infirmieres, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
François GallantDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jennifer HakimCentre de formation médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick, Université de Sherbrooke, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Claire JohnsonSchool of Public Studies, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Caroline JoseVitalité Health Network, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Alan KatzDepartments of Family Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Adrian MacKenzieNova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ruth Martin-MisenerSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4554-7635
Rita McCrackenDepartment of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2962-0364
Elizabeth NetheryFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Helena Piccinini-VallisDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5060-2120
Sandra PetersonCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ian ScottDepartment of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hugh ShiplettUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Sarah SimkinFamily Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7770-7747
Sarah SpencerFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7034-6387
Rachel ThelenTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie WeltonFamily Medicine (South West Nova Site), Dalhousie University, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4697-3165
Erin WilsonSchool of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Maryland, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite having more family physicians (FPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) per capita than ever before in Canada, there is a clear gap between population primary care needs and system capacity. Primary care needs may be shaped by population ageing, increasing clinical and social complexity and growing service intensity. System capacity may be shaped by falling practice volumes, increasing administrative workload, changing clinician demographics and new health system roles (eg, hospitalist and focused practices). These changing factors could contribute to reduced patient access to primary care, worsened health inequities and stress and overwork among primary care clinicians. Workforce planning tools used in most countries do not adequately consider these factors. Our study will identify and explore factors shaping population service use and system capacity over time and develop planning tools to estimate future primary care needs and capacity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will interview FPs and NPs about factors shaping workload, including patient characteristics, practice expectations and system context. This will inform analysis of administrative data to describe factors shaping primary care need (patient demographics, clinical and social complexity, service intensity) and capacity (provider supply, demographics, service volume, roles) over a 20-year period from 2004/2005 to 2023/2024. Qualitative and quantitative findings will inform analytical models that project and compare need and capacity under stakeholder-informed scenarios. The study includes the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, provinces with varied policy and population contexts and complementary administrative health data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics board (REB) approval for the qualitative study has been provided by Research Ethics BC, with subsequent approvals from Horizon Health Network, Nova Scotia Health, University of Manitoba and University of Ottawa. REB approval for analysis of linked administrative data was obtained from the Nova Scotia Health REB, Research Ethics BC, University of Manitoba and University of New Brunswick. Our findings will support primary care capacity planning to equitably meet the needs of a growing and ageing population.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandNurse PractitionersPrimary Health CareCanadaHumansResearch DesignWorkloadHealth Services AccessibilityHealth WorkforcePrimary Care

Identifiers

PMID40118474
PMCPMC11931926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.