ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Genomic Exploration of Essential Hypertension in African-Brazilian Quilombo Populations: A Comprehensive Approach With Pedigree Analysis and Family-Based Association Studies.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sodium, potassium, and blood pressure regulation in Latin American populations: a critical narrative review of multifactorial determinants.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Differential methylation in blood pressure control genes is associated to essential hypertension in African Brazilian populations.Epigenetics · 2025Article
- Animal models of hypertension and concurrent organs injury.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEssential hypertension (EH) is a global health issue. Despite extensive research, much of EH heritability remains unexplained. We investigated the genetic basis of EH in African-derived individuals from partially isolated quilombo populations in Vale do Ribeira (São Paulo, Brazil). METHODS AND
resultsSamples from 431 individuals (167 affected, 261 unaffected, 3 unknown) were genotyped using a 650 000 single-nucleotide polymorphism array. Estimated global ancestry proportions were 47% African, 36% European, and 16% Native American. We constructed 6 pedigrees using additional data from 673 individuals and created 3 nonoverlapping single-nucleotide polymorphism subpanels. We phased haplotypes and performed local ancestry analysis to account for admixture. Genome-wide linkage analysis and fine-mapping via family-based association studies were conducted, prioritizing EH-associated genes through a systematic approach involving databases like PubMed, ClinVar, and GWAS (Genome-Wide Association Studies) Catalog. Linkage analysis identified 22 regions of interest with logarithm of the odds scores ranging from 1.45 to 3.03, encompassing 2363 genes. Fine-mapping (family-based association studies) identified 60 EH-related candidate genes and 117 suggestive/significant variants. Among these, 14 genes, including
conclusionsThrough a complementary approach combining admixture-adjusted Genome-wide linkage analysis based on Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, family-based association studies on known and imputed data, and gene prioritizing, new loci, variants, and candidate genes were identified. These findings provide targets for future research, replication in other populations, facilitate personalized treatments, and improve public health toward African-derived underrepresented populations. Limitations include restricted single-nucleotide polymorphism coverage, self-reported pedigree data, and lack of available EH genomic studies on admixed populations for independent validation, despite the performed genetic correlation analyses using summary statistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.