Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119100›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring the impact of hyperparameter and data augmentation in YOLO V10 for accurate bone fracture detection from X-ray images.

Parvathaneni Naga Srinivasu, Gorli L Aruna Kumari, Sujatha Canavoy Narahari, Shakeel Ahmed, Abdulaziz Alhumam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anatomical study and early diagnosis of dome galls inFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parvathaneni Naga SrinivasuAmrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amaravati, 522503, Andhra Pradesh, India. parvathanenins@gmail.com.
Gorli L Aruna KumariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, GST, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, AP, India.
Sujatha Canavoy NarahariDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, 501301, India.
Shakeel AhmedSchool of Computer Science (SCS), Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, 47500, Malaysia.
Abdulaziz AlhumamDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately identifying bone fractures from the X-ray image is essential to prompt timely and appropriate medical treatment. This research explores the impact of hyperparameters and data augmentation techniques on the performance of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) V10 architecture for bone fracture detection. While YOLO architectures have been widely employed in object detection tasks, recognizing bone fractures, which can appear as subtle and complicated patterns in X-ray images, requires rigorous model tuning. Image augmentation was done using the image unsharp masking approach and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization before training the model. The augmented images assist in feature identification and contribute to overall performance of the model. The current study has performed extensive experiments to analyze the influence of hyperparameters like the number of epochs and the learning rate, along with the analysis of the data augmentation on the input data. The experimental outcome has proven that particular hyperparameter combinations, when paired with targeted augmentation strategies, improve the accuracy and precision of fracture detection. It is observed that the proposed model yielded an accuracy of 0.964 on evaluation over the augmented data. The statistical analysis of the classification precision across the augmented and raw images is observed as 0.98 and 0.95, respectively. In comparison with other deep learning models, the empirical evaluation of the YOLO V10 model clearly demonstrates its superior performance over conventional approaches for bone fracture detection.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiographyAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansX-RaysBone fractureData augmentationDeep learningHyperparametersYOLO model

Identifiers

PMID40119100
PMCPMC11928462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.