Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119235›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2025

The synergy of embodied cognition and cognitive load theory for optimized learning.

Liye Zou, Zhihao Zhang, Myrto Mavilidi, Yanxia Chen, Fabian Herold, Kim Ouwehand, Fred Paas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liye ZouBody-Brain-Mind Laboratory, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. liyezou123@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6411-5710
Zhihao ZhangBody-Brain-Mind Laboratory, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3634-453X
Myrto MavilidiSchool of Education, Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-8709
Yanxia ChenBody-Brain-Mind Laboratory, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5629-2995
Fabian HeroldResearch Group Degenerative and Chronic Diseases, Movement, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3453-090X
Kim OuwehandDepartment of Psychology Education and Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-0188
Fred PaasDepartment of Psychology Education and Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-5305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of embodied cognition and cognitive load theory offers a promising framework for advancing educational practices. Cognitive load theory emphasizes the constraints of working memory and the importance of managing cognitive load through effective instructional design. Embodied cognition highlights the role of physical actions, such as gestures, object manipulation and whole-body activities, in enhancing cognitive processes. This Review highlights the importance of bridging these frameworks by exploring their theoretical foundations and synthesizing empirical evidence on the benefits of physical actions in learning. Here we present the introduction of the relevance-integration taxonomy as a transformative advancement in embodied cognition research, offering new perspectives for educational interventions. Additionally, we identify current gaps in cognitive load theory applications and propose future research directions to unify these approaches, aiming to optimize learning outcomes across diverse educational settings. This work has broad implications for advancing evidence-based instructional design.

Indexed as

CognitionLearningMemory, Short-TermPsychological TheoryHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.