Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40119615›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology

ACP-DPE: A Dual-Channel Deep Learning Model for Anticancer Peptide Prediction.

Guohua Huang, Yujie Cao, Qi Dai, Weihong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guohua HuangCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang, China.
Yujie CaoCollege of Information Science and Engineering, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang, China.
Qi DaiCollege of Life Science and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Weihong ChenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Finance & Economics Big Data Science and Technology, Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0292-3447

Funding

Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department 24A0694Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department 24A0701Shaoyang University Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project CX2023SY046Special Support Plan Project for High Level Talents in Zhejiang Province 2021R52019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a serious and complex disease caused by uncontrolled cell growth and is becoming one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Anticancer peptides (ACPs), as a bioactive peptide with lower toxicity, emerge as a promising means of effectively treating cancer. Identifying ACPs is challenging due to the limitation of experimental conditions. To address this, we proposed a dual-channel-based deep learning method, termed ACP-DPE, for ACP prediction. The ACP-DPE consisted of two parallel channels: one was an embedding layer followed by the bi-directional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) module, and the other was an adaptive embedding layer followed by the dilated convolution module. The Bi-GRU module captured the peptide sequence dependencies, whereas the dilated convolution module characterised the local relationship of amino acids. Experimental results show that ACP-DPE achieves an accuracy of 82.81% and a sensitivity of 86.63%, surpassing the state-of-the-art method by 3.86% and 5.1%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of ACP-DPE for ACP prediction and highlight its potential as a valuable tool in cancer treatment research.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsComputational BiologyDeep LearningPeptidesHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsPeptidesbioinformaticsbiologydrugs

Identifiers

PMID40119615
PMCPMC11928748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.