ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
p53-deficient cancer cells hyperactivate DNA double-strand break repair pathways to overcome chemotherapeutic damage and augment survival.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronotherapy in Hematological Malignancies: Evaluating the Rationale and Evidence.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Review
- Diffuse Midline Gliomas: Clinical, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- High-throughput drug screening in advanced pre-clinical 3D melanoma models identifies potential first-line therapies for NRAS-mutated melanoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundp53 deficiency in cancer is associated with chemoresistance and cancer progression. However, the precise role of p53 in regulating DDR in the context of chemoresistance is still unclear. METHODS AND
resultsIn the present study, we investigated the regulatory role of p53 on the cellular recovery potential upon transient DNA damage. p53 deficiency promotes cell survival following transient DNA damage induction. During recovery, p53 deficient cells display temporary S/G2/M arrest, returning to normal cell cycle profile, while p53 proficient cells remain permanently arrested in the S-phase. Additionally, colony formation assay revealed 50% clonogenicity in p53-proficient cells, while p53-deficient cells showed 90% clonogenicity. Chemoresistance also correlated with accelerated DNA repair in p53-deficient cells. Since doxorubicin induces DNA double-strand breaks, whose repair is driven by two major pathways: homology-directed repair and nonhomologous end joining, we measured their activity during the recovery period. During the early recovery period, both pathways were activated irrespective of p53 expression status. However, during the late recovery time point, NHEJ and HDR activities returned to basal in p53-deficient cells, while their activity was significantly reduced in p53-proficient cells. NHEJ inhibitor Ku57788 could overcome the chemoresistance in p53-deficient cells.
conclusionThus, our findings suggest that sustained DDR promotes chemoresistance and enhanced survival in p53-deficient cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40119972What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.