ArticleScientific reports2025
A groupwise multiresolution network for DCE-MRI image registration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial-temporal radiogenomics in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy for breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In four-dimensional time series such as dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, motion between individual time steps due to the patient's breathing or movement leads to incorrect image analysis, e.g., when calculating perfusion. Image registration of the volumes of the individual time steps is necessary to improve the accuracy of the subsequent image analysis. Both groupwise and multiresolution registration methods have shown great potential for medical image registration. To combine the advantages of groupwise and multiresolution registration, we proposed a groupwise multiresolution network for deformable medical image registration. We applied our proposed method to the registration of DCE-MR images for the assessment of lung perfusion in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The networks were trained unsupervised with Mutual Information and Gradient L2 loss. We compared the groupwise networks with a pairwise deformable registration network and a published groupwise network as benchmarks and the classical registration method SimpleElastix as baseline using four-dimensional DCE-MR scans of patients after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. Experimental results showed that our groupwise network yields results with high spatial alignment (SSIM up to 0.953 ± 0.025 or 0.936 ± 0.028 respectively), medically plausible transformation with low image folding (|J| ≤ 0: 0.0 ± 0.0%), and a low registration time of less than 10 seconds for a four-dimensional DCE-MR scan with 50 time steps. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that image registration with the proposed groupwise network enhances the accuracy of medical image analysis by leading to more homogeneous perfusion maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.