Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40121327›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and their associations with hearing loss.

Ali Nabavi, Farimah Safari, Ali Faramarzi, Mohammad Kashkooli, Meskerem Aleka Kebede, Tesfamariam Aklilu, Leo Anthony Celi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali NabaviOtolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Farimah SafariStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. farimasafari40@gmail.com.
Ali FaramarziOtolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad KashkooliStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Meskerem Aleka KebedeGlobal Surgery Policy Unit, Department of Health Policy, LSE Health, London, UK.
Tesfamariam AkliluSchool of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Leo Anthony CeliLaboratory for Computational Physiology, MIT Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss poses immense burden worldwide and early detection is crucial. The accurate models identify high-risk groups, enabling timely intervention to improve quality of life. The subtle changes in hearing often go unnoticed, presenting a challenge for early hearing loss detection. While machine learning shows promise, prior studies have not leveraged cardiovascular risk factors known to impact hearing. As hearing outcomes remain challenging to characterize associations, we evaluated a new approach to predict current hearing outcomes through machine learning models using cardiovascular risk factors. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2012-2018 data comprising audiometric tests and cardiovascular risk factors was utilized. Machine learning algorithms were trained to classify hearing impairment thresholds and predict pure tone average values. Key results showed light gradient boosted machine performing best in classifying mild or greater impairment (> 25 dB HL) with 80.1% accuracy. It also classified > 16 dB HL and > 40 dB HL thresholds, with accuracies exceeding 77% and 86% respectively. The study also found that CatBoost and Gradient Boosting performed well in classifying hearing loss thresholds, with test set accuracies around 0.79 and F1-scores around 0.79-0.80. A multi-layer neural network emerged as the top predictor of pure tone averages, achieving a mean absolute error of just 3.05 dB. Feature analysis identified age, gender, blood pressure and waist circumference as key associated factors. Findings offer a promising direction for a clinically applicable tool, personalized prevention strategies, and calls for prospective validation.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHearing LossHeart Disease Risk FactorsMachine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsAudiometry, Pure-ToneFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRisk FactorsCardiovascular risk factorsHearing outcomeMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40121327
PMCPMC11929821

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.