ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and their associations with hearing loss.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep sequence learning with multi-task supervision for scalable population health monitoring.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association between occupational hearing loss and predicted 10 year cardiovascular risk among middle aged industrial workers.PloS one · 2026Article
- Risk Prediction of Low Bone Density in Elderly Patients with Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms.Balkan medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing loss poses immense burden worldwide and early detection is crucial. The accurate models identify high-risk groups, enabling timely intervention to improve quality of life. The subtle changes in hearing often go unnoticed, presenting a challenge for early hearing loss detection. While machine learning shows promise, prior studies have not leveraged cardiovascular risk factors known to impact hearing. As hearing outcomes remain challenging to characterize associations, we evaluated a new approach to predict current hearing outcomes through machine learning models using cardiovascular risk factors. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2012-2018 data comprising audiometric tests and cardiovascular risk factors was utilized. Machine learning algorithms were trained to classify hearing impairment thresholds and predict pure tone average values. Key results showed light gradient boosted machine performing best in classifying mild or greater impairment (> 25 dB HL) with 80.1% accuracy. It also classified > 16 dB HL and > 40 dB HL thresholds, with accuracies exceeding 77% and 86% respectively. The study also found that CatBoost and Gradient Boosting performed well in classifying hearing loss thresholds, with test set accuracies around 0.79 and F1-scores around 0.79-0.80. A multi-layer neural network emerged as the top predictor of pure tone averages, achieving a mean absolute error of just 3.05 dB. Feature analysis identified age, gender, blood pressure and waist circumference as key associated factors. Findings offer a promising direction for a clinically applicable tool, personalized prevention strategies, and calls for prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.