ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Integration of AI lesion classification, age, and BI-RADS assessment to reduce benign biopsies on breast ultrasound.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Current Research Landscape on Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Ultrasound Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis: A Dual-Database Bibliometric Study.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Ultrasound viscosity imaging empowers BI-RADS: toward precise breast lesion diagnosis and analysis of HER2 status.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and test AI-integrated biopsy avoidance strategies to improve the specificity of screening breast ultrasound (US). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive asymptomatic women with BI-RADS 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, or 5 masses on screening breast US exams acquired from two hospitals between December 2019 and December 2020 (development cohort) and June 2020 and December 2020 (external validation cohort). If more than one lesion was present, the most suspicious lesion was analyzed. Logistic regression was used to develop the AI-integrated biopsy avoidance strategies in which BI-RADS 4a masses were downgraded to BI-RADS 3 if the AI classifications were "both planes benign" in all women or "benign and malignant" in the women ≤ 45 years of age. Diagnostic performance metrics were calculated for both cohorts and compared to initial assessments by radiologists using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for noninferiority of sensitivity (relative noninferiority margin, 5%) and the McNemar test for specificity.
resultsThe development and external validation cohorts consisted of 393 women (median age, 45 years [IQR, 40-50 years]) with 101 malignancies and 166 women (median age, 47 years [IQR, 42-51 years]) with 31 malignancies, respectively. The developed strategy improved specificity from 53.3% (72/135; 95% CI: 45.0, 62.1) to 80.7% (109/135; [95% CI: 74.2, 87.5]; p < 0.001) while maintaining sensitivity (both 100% [31/31; 95% CI: 98.9, 100]), and would have avoided 61.7% (37/60 [95% CI: 48.2, 73.7]) of benign biopsies of BI-RADS 4a masses in the external validation cohort.
conclusionA strategy integrating AI classification in two orthogonal planes, age, and BI-RADS classification improved the specificity of screening breast US while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity. KEY POINTS: Question How can integrating AI lesion classification, age, and BI-RADS assessment effectively reduce benign biopsies in screening breast ultrasound? Findings A strategy integrating AI classifications, age, and BI-RADS using multivariable logistic regression improved specificity while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity in breast ultrasound screening. Clinical relevance The integration of AI classification in two orthogonal planes, along with patient age and BI-RADS classification, shows potential for reducing benign breast biopsies without compromising sensitivity, leading to more efficient clinical decision-making, reduced patient anxiety, and decreased healthcare resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40121344What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.