ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring patterns of multimorbidity in South Korea using exploratory factor analysis and non negative matrix factorization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of multimorbidity and the co-occurrence of multiple chronic diseases presents a measurable challenge to public health, impacting healthcare strategies and planning. This study aimed to explore disease patterns and temporal clustering using data from South Korea's National Health Insurance Service, spanning 2002-2019. The dataset included approximately 1 million individuals, focusing on those with at least two chronic diseases while excluding individuals who died within five years of follow-up. We analyzed 126 non-communicable diseases, considering only those with a prevalence above 1%, and applied a wash-out period to determine incidence. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) were used to identify disease clustering over time. Participants were divided into four groups: men and women in their 50 s and 60 s. EFA identified five patterns in men in their 50 s and seven in their 60 s, while four patterns emerged in women in their 50 s and five in their 60 s. NMF identified 10 clusters for men in their 50 s, 15 in their 60 s, and 16 clusters for women in both age groups. Our study confirms established comorbidity patterns and reveals previously unrecognized clusters, providing data-driven insights into multimorbidity mechanisms and supporting evidence-based healthcare strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.