Evidence mapPaperPMID 40121389Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Gut microbiome, dietary habits, and prostate cancer: a two-step Mendelian randomization revealing the causal associations.

Junhua Guo, Ting Huang, Heran Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junhua Guo *Department of Oncology, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, No. 453 Stadium Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ting HuangDepartment of Oncology, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, No. 453 Stadium Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China.
Heran Zhou *Department of Oncology, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, No. 453 Stadium Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China. heranzhou100@163.com.

Funding

the Construction Fund of Medical Key Disciplines of Hangzhou 2020SJZDXK004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies suggest that diet fizzy drinks may contribute to prostate cancer (PCa) development. However, the causal effects between diet fizzy drinks and PCa and whether gut microbiota (GM) act as a mediator remain unclear.

methodsWe conducted two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses utilizing large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data from the UK Biobank, the MiBioGen consortium, and PCa-related datasets. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used to evaluate the causal effects of GM and dietary preferences on PCa risk. A mediation analysis was performed to investigate whether GM mediates the relationship between dietary factors and PCa risk.

resultsDiet fizzy drink consumption was causally associated with reduced PCa risk (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.99, P = 0.041) and decreased abundance of PCa-risk-related GM taxa (Negativicutes and Selenomonadales). Mediation analysis did not reveal a statistically significant mediation effect, with a mediation proportion of 16% (95% CI: - 0.06-0.37, P = 0.13).

conclusionConsumption of diet fizzy drinks may reduce the risk of PCa, potentially through modulation of the GM; however, further studies are required to confirm these findings and clarify underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

Diet fizzy drinksGenome-wide association studiesGut microbiomeMendelian randomizationProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID40121389
PMCPMC11929656

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.