ArticleBMC public health2025
Noise-induced hearing loss and blood factors: results from a comprehensive cross-sectional study in Iran.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Situational analysis of health systems for ear and hearing care in the World Health Organization (WHO) Eastern Mediterranean Region: A systematic review and evidence synthesis to inform national policies and strategies.SSM - health systems · 2026Article
- Acoustic performance optimization of natural-fiber micro-perforated panels backed by an optimized polyurethane-fibrogranule composite.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the Awareness of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss from Headphone Use: A Cross-Sectional Study Integrating the Health Belief Model and COM-B Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNoise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a common occupational hazard and a leading cause of hearing impairment among industrial workers. Previous studies have primarily focused on the association between physiological parameters and excessive noise exposure (above 85 dB). This study investigates the impact of sound exposure below the permissible limit (between 82 and 85 dB) on blood factors and hearing loss.
methodsThis cross-sectional analytical study examined 8946 male facility technicians from various industries in Iran, who were exposed to sound levels between 82 and 85 decibels (action limit) over a period of one year. The study examined various blood factors, including complete blood cell count (CBC), blood group (BG), fasting blood glucose (FBS), lipid factors such as triglycerides (TG) and cholesterol (Chol), and also blood pressure (BP). Additionally, the hearing status of participants was evaluated using pure tone audiometry for both ears.
resultsThe results indicated that age, work experience, SBP, FBS, Chol, Hb, Plt, and Hct were the main factors influencing hearing loss. FBS showed the highest impact on workers' hearing loss, accounting for 36.70% of the variance. Furthermore, Hb and PLT followed with weights of 19.10% and 12.4%, respectively. However, no significant relationship was observed concerning the blood group type.
conclusionExposure to noise levels below the permissible limit can lead to hearing loss in individuals. Moreover, FBS, Hb, and PLT were identified as blood factors affecting hearing loss in people. Understanding this will provide the basis for future guidelines on how to care for these workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.