Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40121480›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2025

Implementation of a nurse-delivered, community-based liver screening and assessment program for people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (LOCATE-NAFLD trial).

Michelle J Allen, Ruth Tulleners, David Brain, James O'Beirne, Elizabeth E Powell, Adrian Barnett, Patricia C Valery, Sanjeewa Kularatna, Ingrid J Hickman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle J AllenAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. m27.allen@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-4054
Ruth TullenersAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David BrainAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6612-348X
James O'BeirneUniversity of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3400-2816
Elizabeth E PowellCentre for Liver Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5008-8061
Adrian BarnettAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-0374
Patricia C ValeryQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8823-3006
Sanjeewa KularatnaAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5650-154X
Ingrid J HickmanClinical Trials Capability, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland ULTRA Team, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3205-9165

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund (Australia) APP1175567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the high burden of Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), (previously known as Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - NAFLD) in the community, current models of care that require specialist review for disease risk stratification overwhelm hospital clinic capacity and create inefficiencies in care. The LOCal Assessment and Triage Evaluation of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (LOCATE-NAFLD) randomised trial compared usual care to a community-based nurse delivered liver risk assessment. This study evaluates the implementation strategy of the LOCATE model.

methodsThe evaluation used mixed methods (quantitative trial data and qualitative framework analysis of semi-structured interviews) to explore the general practitioner (GP) and patient perspectives of acceptability (Acceptability Framework), and factors associated with reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM framework) of the LOCATE model of care.

resultsThe LOCATE model was considered highly acceptable by both patients and GPs. The model of care achieved appropriate reach across the participating health services, reaching high-risk patients faster than usual care and with predominantly positive patient experiences. A notable reduction in anxiety and stress was experienced in the intervention group due to the shorter waiting times between referral and assessment. There was an overall perception of confidence in nursing staff capability to perform the community-based screening and GPs indicated confidence in managing low-risk MASLD without the need for specialist review. Challenges to implementation, adoption and maintenance included variable prioritisation of liver disease assessment in complex cases, the need for further GP training in MASLD assessment and treatment pathways, available funding and referral pathways for community screening, and accessibility of effective diet and exercise professional support.

conclusionNurse delivered community-based liver screening is highly acceptable to GPs and patients and has shown to be an effective mechanism to identify high risk patients. Adoption and maintenance of the model of care faces significant challenges related to affordable access to screening, prioritisation of liver disease in complex patient cohorts, and unresolved difficulties in prescribing effective strategies for sustained lifestyle intervention in the primary care setting.

trial registrationThe trial was registered on 30 January 2020 and can be found via Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12620000158965.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesMass ScreeningNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentAcceptabilityCommunity-based managementImplementation evaluationMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver diseaseNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseRandomised controlled trialRE-AIM framework

Identifiers

PMID40121480
PMCPMC11929169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.