Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40121543›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Container applications for the development and integration of virtual imaging platforms.

Bruno Barufaldi, Miguel A Lago, Ehsan Abadi, Andrew D A Maidment

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruno BarufaldiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Miguel A LagoDivision of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software Reliability, OSEL, CDRH, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Ehsan AbadiDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA.
Andrew D A MaidmentDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Susan G. Komen CCR231010477Terri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation 2023 TBBCF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual imaging trials (VIT) have made significant advancements through the development of realistic human anatomy models, scanner-specific simulations, and virtual image interpretation. To promote VIT widespread adoption in the medical imaging community, it is important to develop methods that unify and facilitate the use of VITs, ensuring their reliable application across various imaging studies.  PURPOSE: We developed a containerized environment to enhance collaboration and interoperability across VIT platforms. This environment integrates key components of two well-established breast imaging platforms (OpenVCT and VICTRE), enabling direct comparison between specific modules for simulating anthropomorphic phantoms, lesions, and x-ray images.

methodsWrappers were developed to simplify the setup and execution of OpenVCT and VICTRE platforms and ensure compatibility and interoperability across different software components. These wrappers can streamline the installation of necessary packages, data formatting, and pipeline execution. The containerized environment was built using Docker images to provide resources for cross-platform integration. The breast anatomy generated by VICTRE was augmented using a simplex-based method from OpenVCT, providing additional texture modeling of breast parenchyma. Power spectra (PS) were calculated to assess the texture complexity of the simulated breast tissue and compare the outcomes. Lesion simulations were performed using breast models with calcifications and masses, allowing for a comparison of Monte Carlo (VICTRE) and raytracing (OpenVCT) imaging techniques. Key differences in x-ray attenuation models and image reconstruction methods were analyzed to evaluate the differences in the reconstructed images and overall image quality.

resultsThe containerized approach simplified the setup and execution of the simulation platforms, embedding all the necessary packages and dependencies into the Docker images. These containerized environments supported the simulation of anthropomorphic breast models and x-ray images using both Monte Carlo (VICTRE) and raytracing (OpenVCT) methods. The breast images generated using the conventional VICTRE and the integrated simplex-based method from OpenVCT were visually comparable. The

conclusionsContainerized environments enable cross-platform comparisons and hybrid approaches. In this work, Docker images provided all the resources to simulate and compare the outcomes in breast phantom and x-ray image simulations, ensuring their robustness and reproducibility. The integration of VICTRE and OpenVCT methods allowed for data augmentation and provided resources for selection of imaging methods. The work lays a foundation for future VIT advancements, ensuring that these resources remain credible, reproducible, and accessible to the research community.

Indexed as

SoftwareBreastHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMammographyPhantoms, Imagingbreast phantommammographytomosynthesisvirtual imaging trial

Identifiers

PMID40121543
PMCPMC12149687

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.