Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40122550›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

HiSNAP trial-a multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded end point, safety and efficacy trial of conventional (300 mg/kg) versus higher doses of acetylcysteine (450 mg/kg and 600 mg/kg) in patients with paracetamol overdose in the UK: study protocol.

Christopher Humphries, Ellise Clarke, Michael Eddleston, Marianne Gillings, Sian Irvine, Liza Keating, Anna Miell, Lynsey Milne, Laura Muir, Rachel O'Brien and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Christopher HumphriesCentre for Cardiovascular Science, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6231-2603
Ellise ClarkeEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Michael EddlestonCentre for Cardiovascular Science, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Marianne GillingsHiSNAP Trial Steering Committee, Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sian IrvineEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Liza KeatingHiSNAP Data Monitoring Committee, Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Anna MiellEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lynsey MilneEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Laura MuirHiSNAP Trial Steering Committee, Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rachel O'BrienEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Katherine OateyEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rajendra RamanEmergency Department, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, UK.
Ruben ThanacoodyHiSNAP Trial Steering Committee, Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sharon TuckEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christopher J WeirEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-4903
David M WoodHiSNAP Data Monitoring Committee, Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
James W DearCentre for Cardiovascular Science, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK james.dear@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8630-8625
HiSNAP Trial Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn overdose, a larger proportion of paracetamol (acetaminophen) is converted in the liver to the toxic metabolite METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre trial, taking place across several hospitals in Scotland, UK, within Emergency Departments and Acute Medical Units. Recruitment commenced on 19 February 2024 and is anticipated to run for approximately 2 years. This is a three-group dose-finding trial, in which participants are assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to either Standard NAC (300 mg/kg) or higher doses of 450 mg/kg (Group 1) and 600 mg/kg (Group 2). The primary outcome is the proportion of paracetamol metabolites in the circulation that are directly produced by GSH/NAC detoxification of NAPQI. A higher proportion of these metabolites will indicate that the additional NAC is reducing the amount of toxic paracetamol metabolites in the body. The study will first test the primary outcome on the HiSNAP Group 2 against Standard NAC; only if that is significant will HiSNAP Group 1 be tested against Standard NAC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The HiSNAP trial has been approved by the East Midlands (Derby) Research Ethics Committee (reference 23/EM/0129), NHS Lothian Research and Development Department, and the MHRA. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication, conferences and linked on isrctn.com. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17516192.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAcetylcysteineAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAntidotesChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDrug OverdoseAdultFemaleGlutathioneHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomAcetaminophenAcetylcysteineAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAntidotesGlutathioneCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYClinical TrialHepatology

Identifiers

PMID40122550
PMCPMC11977480

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.