Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40123085›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2025

Intramuscular vasopressin: A feasible intervention for prehospital hemodynamic stabilization in porcine hemorrhagic shock and whole blood transfusion.

Mattias Renberg, Tomas Karlsson, Mikael Gellerfors, Jenny Gustavsson, Katrin Wellfelt, Mattias Günther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hemodynamic rescue after blast injury: intravenous administration outperforms intramuscular vasopressin in a swine model.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mattias RenbergDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-5563
Tomas KarlssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0894-7288
Mikael GellerforsDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jenny GustavssonDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katrin WellfeltDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mattias GüntherDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Totalförsvarets Forskningsinsitut
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemorrhagic shock is the leading cause of preventable prehospital trauma deaths. While arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a well-known hormone with vasopressor effects, its potential for hemodynamic stabilization in prehospital hemorrhagic shock remains underexplored. This study investigated intramuscular (IM) AVP during hemorrhagic shock to evaluate its feasibility and efficacy for prehospital trauma resuscitation. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsIn this randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial, 16 swine (mean [standard deviation, SD] weight 56.2 [3.8] kg) underwent a mean (SD) 1205 (124) mL Class III hemorrhage for 45 min and 45 min of hypotension. Animals were randomized to 40 U IM AVP (n = 7) or NaCl (n = 9), followed immediately by 500 mL autologous whole blood transfusion over 30 and 120 min posttransfusion monitoring of hemodynamic, respiratory, and metabolic parameters.

resultsAVP increased systolic arterial pressure 30 min after administration (mean increase: 33.5 mmHg vs. 7.5 mmHg, p < 0.05) and improved cardiac index (CI) 90 min after AVP (mean increase: 19.2% vs. 4.1% decrease, p < 0.05) and stroke volume (mean increase: 37.0% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.05). These effects normalized by 120 min. AVP did not affect respiratory parameters, oxygen delivery, or consumption. Increased serum AVP confirmed systemic uptake (median 68.7 pg/mL vs. 10.0 pg/mL in controls, p < 0.05).

conclusionIM AVP, combined with whole blood transfusion, transiently stabilized hemodynamics by increasing systemic vascular resistance index, systolic blood pressure, and CI without respiratory compromise. These findings suggest that IM AVP may be a viable intervention for prehospital resuscitation of severe hemorrhagic shock, offering vital short-term stabilization to facilitate transport to definitive care.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionHemodynamicsShock, HemorrhagicVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsAnimalsEmergency Medical ServicesInjections, IntramuscularSwineVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinshemodynamic stabilizationhemorrhagic shockintramusculartrauma resuscitationvasopressinwhole blood transfusion

Identifiers

PMID40123085
PMCPMC12035989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.